/int/ - International

>>12339 Why aren't you in Russia, you dumb putincocksucker? I don't think forced draft is nice. But forced draft is a necessity in a defensive war. And if you think think your own country would do different in such a war, you are an idiot and/or a zoomerfuck born after the cold war.

>>12351 >putincocksucker Fuck poccnr too btw >forced draft is a necessity in a defensive war the citizens are uninterested in fighting, since the country's leadership must be upheld at any cost except that of the jews in charge

>>12345 >Zigger débile is also a lolitard Why am i not surprised?

>>12355 ?

All Ukranians should follow this man's example and execute the faggots feeding their citizens into the meatgrinder to keep Zelensky in power.

>>12354 If citizens are interested in defending their own house and homes against invaders, the question needs to be asked why that is. For Germany it's easy, because too many of them are foreigners who have no connection to the land and will just fuck off to where they came from. But it might also be the result of a previous war of propaganda, Jewish antics to enfranchise the people from their own country (also seen here) and other such things. There is also the simple fact that nobody likes cowards who only come back after others have shed their blood for them.

>>12358 >the question needs to be asked why that is. Why indeed >The series was produced by Kvartal 95, which was founded by Zelenskyy.[5] It would become much more involved in Ukraine's actual politics; in 2018, a political party named after the television series was registered,[6] and Zelenskyy was elected president of Ukraine in 2019.[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servant_of_the_People_(2015_TV_series) So >makes a production company >which makes a show starring himself as Ukranian president >then makes a political party named the same as the show >uses that to run for Ukranian president >(((wins))) All within 5-6 years, lol Clearly this man stole their presidency and is legally ethnically cleansing them; OF COURSE they don't want to die for him

>>12356 Only pedos have reaction images of underage kids saved and at hand. >>12357 >Just roll over and give up There is a nice word in German for it, called Wehrkraftzersetzung. Proper punishment for this needs to come back.

>>12360 You do realize there are hundreds of millions of stock pictures easily available on the internet via term search, yes? Why do stock pictures of children make you think "sex" at all?

>>12359 So you propose Ukraine just gives up and let's russniggers annex them? Have you been dropped a few times at birth or are you russoid by descent?

>>12361 >Available Why do you feel the need to use an underage child as a source of an reaction image? Or just cut it short: Did you ever fap to Loli content?

to be honest, if it does turn out that anti-Ukraine posts are a violation of your hoster's rules, then you should by all rights be banning pro-Ukraine posts as well, since no anti-Ukraine posts could be made; because otherwise that is a ridiculously unfair slant, and it's going to catch endless people up in bans

I thank you for being reasonable about the discussion in IRC however

>>12374 All /pol/ cancer should be banned. There are enough other places on the interwebs where people are already fighting about that crap all day.

>>12376 to be honest that is going to cause so many problems since that's one of the primary things /int/ is known for I agree the idiot level troll shit is one thing, but reasonable, intelligent discussion of anything should never be banned

>>12377 >since that's one of the primary things /int/ is known for >reasonable, intelligent discussion of anything should never be banned If int is known for anything, specially since the years during corona and onward, it's certainly not reasonable, intelligent discussion

>>12363 It's not my fault so many niggers on these make such stupid arguments that smug and confused children are the only appropriate reaction >Did you ever fap to Loli content? define "loli content" since niggers ITT are using words that have completely different meanings such as "nonce", based of fucking prison nigger redefinitions

>>12383 lel I can't argue with that, but that's everywhere

>>12385 So when he speaks about /pol/-cancer being banned, he is talking about exactly this. Niemand hat die Absicht reasonable discussion zu bannen

>>12387 >So when he speaks about /pol/-cancer being banned, he is talking about exactly this. >>12377 >I agree the idiot level troll shit is one thing are you this guy >>12363 we should go back to that discussion instead

>>12389 No, i am actually another Bavaria-Bernd, lol

>>12390 it happens, why I asked

>>12384 >Define Loli content 2D/3D Pictures/videos of underage girls that do not pass as adults. You beating around the bush instead of clearly answering the simple question already tells me most of what I want to know.

>>12374 >Endless people The literal handful of ziggers here is not an endless amount, orc.

>>12419 Ask me if I give a shit about what you want to know. Clearly you're the type of asshurt faggot that's going to insist on your interpretation of who I am despite whatever I say, so why should I give a fuck? Kiss the entirety of my ass.

>>12419 >Why do stock pictures of children make you think "sex" at all? This is still weirder than me using them, no matter your cope :) You're the one instantly thinking "sex" from stock pictures of children. Not me.

>>12374 so was a determination ever made on whether it's ok to make anti-Ukraine posts here or not

>>12431 >>12531 >zigger >pedonigger RAUS!

>>12533 source?

>one of like 5 posters on the site <RAUS cause opinions and unfounded accusations lel

it's pretty fucking hilarious that you can spark a pedo panic in some people just by posting stock images, on their own, zero words or posts about anything pedophilia at all, just simply easily acquirable by anyone stock pictures attached to a post

>>12536 I just wanted to shit on pedoniggers, I don't know if you're being disingenuous. Regardless, the least this place resembles a pedonigger haven, the better. I support banning pictures of children entirely.

>>12539 that's nice, buttercup >I support banning pictures of children entirely. surely that's not some insane level of triggering over nothing, surely

matter of fact I started posting stock pics of kids on a site that implemented such a rule, to make the moderators feel like retards for banning me over it and then happened to discover what an incredibly effective triggering mechanism it was

BTW that site was owned by who would become owner of the site that hosted /leftypol/

>>12541 But why would you care? Surely a definitely non-pedonigger wouldn't give a shit, would he? ;) ;)

>>12544 because it's retarded? did you ever consider there's something wrong with you when your brain instantly associates any image of a child with pedophilia?

of course you don't

>>12545 You need to go back to kohlshit.

>>12547 why are you so upset?

>>12548 Why are you trying to make people upset? Do you want to be the “big bad” texball was talking about so much? You’re just being a dick.

>>12549 >You’re just being a dick. How? all I'm doing is replying to posts aimed at me, by people being dicks to me?

I post a kid pic with a post every now and then, if that makes people upset, it's their problem, not mine

It's completely normal for a grown man to search for and post pictures of random children, average behaviour

>>12552 Why do stock pictures of children make you think "sex" at all?

Literally nothing about any of my posts is pedophilic in the least, it's 100% being inserted there by you

>>12553 I don't think about sex and i didn't call you a pedo, just saying it is weird, like it is weird for grown ups to talk to random children they are not related to

>>12555 >I don't think about sex and i didn't call you a pedo so you have literally no problem whatsoever then; good we can drop it and move on, surely, since the only time it ever comes up at all is when someone brings it up out of nowhere

Why not ban mentally ill fucktards like this guy on sight?

>>12562 >>12548 >why are you so upset?